On June 29, 2026, for the first time, France's National Assembly devoted a colloquium to UFOs — officially "unidentified aerospace phenomena" (in French, PAN; internationally, UAP). Its title was unambiguous: "Research on unidentified aerospace phenomena, beyond fantasies." The event is real and documented. But the gap between what was said and what it is taken to mean is decisive.
Held in the Victor-Hugo room of the Palais-Bourbon, the colloquium was organized by members of parliament Arnaud Saint-Martin and Pierre Henriet. It brought together GEIPAN — the branch of the French space agency (CNES) that records and investigates sightings — along with representatives of the Ministry of Defence, sociologists, the Sigma2 commission of the 3AF (experts who analyze the technical data recorded during sightings), and the Sentinel News outlet. The stated aim: to move past sensationalism and treat the subject as an object of study.
GEIPAN had recorded more than 3,200 cases by the end of 2025. The vast majority are explained: aircraft, balloons, drones, satellites, astronomical or atmospheric phenomena, mistakes and hoaxes. Category "D" — cases still unexplained after investigation — accounts for only about 3% of the total (and closer to 2% in recent years, as old files are re-examined with modern tools). "Unexplained" here means "not enough data to conclude," not "proof of something else."
[DOCUMENTED FACT] The 2026 colloquium did not come out of nowhere: France has officially studied these phenomena since 1977, when GEPAN (the unidentified aerospace phenomena study group) was created within CNES. Renamed SEPRA in 1988, then GEIPAN in 2005 with the addition of a public-information mission, this service is a worldwide singularity: few civilian space agencies have maintained, without interruption for nearly fifty years, a dedicated investigative structure, with its archives progressively put online.
GEIPAN's method is that of an investigation: standardised collection of testimony, reconstruction of the observation conditions (position, weather, air traffic, atmospheric re-entries, balloon releases), search for conventional explanations, then classification of the case from A (identified) to D (unexplained). This protocol explains the key figure: the great majority of cases end up explained, and category D shrinks as analytical tools improve.
[DOCUMENTED FACT] In 1999, a private report written by former senior French military officials, known as the "COMETA report", was already arguing for serious study of the subject — while advancing, as a hypothesis, a possible extraterrestrial origin for certain cases. [HYPOTHESIS] That conclusion committed neither the State nor CNES: it illustrates precisely the line that the 2026 colloquium sought to draw between the methodical study of data and the conclusion that goes beyond it.
[CORRELATION] The French colloquium is also part of a documented international movement: public hearings in the US Congress in July 2023, creation at the Pentagon of the AARO office (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) tasked with centralising military reports, annual reports submitted to Congress. Everywhere, the same shift can be observed: the subject is moving from taboo to administrative file — which in no way prejudges what the data will eventually show.
No document presented at the colloquium, in GEIPAN's archives or in AARO's reports, establishes the extraterrestrial origin of a single case. What the available records show: phenomena that are mostly explained, a residual fraction unexplained for lack of data, and institutions that now agree to discuss the subject publicly. What comes next belongs to the data — calibrated sensors, cross-checked measurements — not to anticipated conclusions.
As in the United States (Congressional hearings, the Pentagon's AARO office), the whole slide happens on language: people quietly move from "unidentified" to "therefore extraterrestrial." GEIPAN, like AARO, documents real and sometimes unidentified phenomena — which is not the same thing as a proven origin. The 2026 colloquium set out precisely to draw that distinction. It is that line, not the promise of a revelation, that makes the subject worth taking seriously.
Yes. It was held on 29 June 2026, in the Victor-Hugo room at the Palais-Bourbon, organised by MPs Arnaud Saint-Martin and Pierre Henriet, under the title "Research on unidentified aerospace phenomena beyond the fantasies".
France has had a scientific service since 1977, GEIPAN (at CNES), which investigates sightings. Recognising that a phenomenon is "unidentified" is not the same as recognising an extraterrestrial origin.
About 3% of GEIPAN's more than 3,200 cases (category "D"), and closer to 2% in recent years. "Unexplained" means "insufficient data to conclude", not "proof of something else".
The Groupe d'études et d'informations sur les phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés, a service of the Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES) created in 1977, which centralises reports and conducts investigations.
No. It is a scientific and parliamentary debate on the method for studying unidentified phenomena, not proof of extraterrestrial origin.
Dossier : UAP / OVNI & déclassification
MINI9: PURSUE — La Plus Grande Déclassification
Accueil · Collection · Journal · Dossiers · Sources