Between the 1970s and 1995, the CIA and the U.S. Army funded a program to perceive distant places and objects through the mind alone: "remote viewing." The program is real, it went through several names (SCANATE, GRILL FLAME, SUN STREAK, then STAR GATE) and cost about 20 million dollars. In 1995, its own official evaluation concluded that it had no operational value. It was shut down and declassified.
Research began in 1972 at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in California, where physicists Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ studied "subjects" meant to describe distant targets from mere coordinates. The program later moved under military control (Army, then the Defense Intelligence Agency) and changed names several times until STAR GATE in the early 1990s.
In 1995 the CIA commissioned a retrospective evaluation from the American Institutes for Research (AIR). Two experts examined the same data: statistician Jessica Utts concluded there was a small statistically significant effect in some subjects; psychologist Ray Hyman judged that conclusion premature, for lack of independent replication. The administrative conclusion: no actionable intelligence produced, therefore no operational value.
[DOCUMENTED FACT] The programme's archives are not a rumour: they can be consulted online. The CIA added a dedicated collection, "STARGATE", to its FOIA reading room, posted in January 2017 with the publication of the CREST database: tens of thousands of pages — session protocols, viewers' sketches, administrative notes, internal evaluations. It is this documentary mass that makes it possible to judge the programme on the record, rather than on the memories of its former participants.
Reading these archives directly is instructive: they contain sessions with vague instructions, sketches open to after-the-fact interpretation, and internal memos expressing doubts, as early as the 1980s, about the value of the intelligence produced. Nothing resembling the psychic weapon of popular retellings.
[DOCUMENTED FACT] The scientific side left a precise trace in the literature. In 1974, Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff published in the journal Nature an article describing experiments in "information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding", conducted at SRI — a publication that gave the field a veneer of academic respectability.
[DOCUMENTED FACT] The rebuttal came from the same journal: in 1978, psychologists David Marks and Richard Kammann published in Nature a critical analysis of the SRI remote-viewing experiments. Their finding: the transcripts given to the judges contained contextual cues (dates, references to previous targets) that made it possible to reconstruct the order of the targets — a protocol flaw sufficient to explain the "hits". Once these cues were neutralised, the results were indistinguishable from chance. This publication-refutation cycle illustrates the normal workings of science; it is rarely cited in enchanted retellings of the programme.
[CORRELATION] The programme's longevity is explained less by its results than by its context: the Cold War. Intelligence notes of the time credited the USSR with funded "psychotronic" research; the fear of an American lag served as a recurring budgetary argument. [HYPOTHESIS] Several observers have also noted that an inexpensive programme — about 20 million dollars over two decades, a modest sum at the scale of American intelligence — was easier to quietly renew than to publicly take responsibility for ending. This reading is plausible, but it is a matter of interpretation, not of documentation.
Stargate is the perfect example of the "studied = proven" trap. Yes, the U.S. government took these phenomena seriously enough to fund them for two decades. No, it never obtained a usable capability — and that is its own assessment talking. The fact is real; the legend of a "psychic superpower validated by the CIA" is not.
As with MK-Ultra or the Gateway document, the CIA explored the margins of the mind. Each time, the same line separates documented exploration from fantasized operational power.
Yes. It is a real remote viewing programme funded by the CIA and the US military from the 1970s to 1995 (successive names: SCANATE, GRILL FLAME, SUN STREAK, STAR GATE), declassified in 1995.
About 20 million dollars over more than twenty years, a significant share of it between the mid-1980s and the early 1990s.
No. Its 1995 assessment (American Institutes for Research) concluded there was no operational usefulness. One expert noted a slight statistical effect in the laboratory; another judged it inconclusive for lack of independent replication.
Because it never produced actionable intelligence. The deviation from chance possibly observed in the laboratory did not translate into a useful capability in the field.
Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ, physicists at the Stanford Research Institute, conducted the first studies; Ingo Swann, an artist, popularised the term "remote viewing" and a protocol based on coordinates.
Dossier : Guerre cognitive & neuro-armes
MINI13: MK-Ultra 2.0 — Les Neuro-Armes
Accueil · Collection · Journal · Dossiers · Sources