The "end of cash" is both a statistical reality and a myth as to its inevitability. A reality, because cash use is declining measurably: according to the European Central Bank's 2024 SPACE study, the share of cash in point-of-sale payments in the euro area fell to 52%, down from 59% in 2022. A myth, because the ECB explicitly states that the digital euro project aims to complement cash, not abolish it — with the right to cash defended separately. Decline is not disappearance, and digitalisation is not a decreed abolition.
Definition. "Cash" refers to the banknotes and coins issued by a central bank: a sovereign, anonymous currency, usable without an intermediary or authorisation. It is the only means of payment that depends neither on an account, nor on a network, nor on a third party's permission. Its singularity lies there: it works offline and, by construction, leaves no trace.
The retreat of cash is not an impression: it is quantified by the central banks themselves. The SPACE study (Study on the Payment Attitudes of Consumers in the Euro area), published regularly by the ECB, measures the real share of cash in everyday transactions. Its 2024 edition establishes that cash now accounts for 52% of point-of-sale payments in the euro area by volume, against 59% two years earlier — a continuous decline, but far from a collapse.
The Swedish case illustrates a more advanced trajectory, often cited as a foreshadowing. In Sweden, cash accounted for only around 8% of in-store payments in 2022 — one of the fastest declines in the world, to the point that the Riksbank, the Swedish central bank, has itself grown concerned about a society in which some citizens could no longer pay in cash at all. The "most cashless" country is also the one thinking hardest about protecting access to cash.
This is where the myth parts from the facts. The ECB, which is leading the digital euro project (a central bank digital currency, or CBDC), has repeated in its official communications that this digital euro would be a complement to cash, not a substitute. The stated objective is not to withdraw banknotes, but to offer a public form of digital money alongside them, at a time when everyday payments are migrating to private solutions.
The nuance is decisive: "complement" and "replace" do not describe the same policy. As long as the law maintains the legal-tender status of banknotes and coins, the digital euro would add to the range of means of payment without closing any of them. Citizen vigilance should therefore focus less on the technical project itself than on the legal guarantees surrounding the preservation of cash — because an institutional promise has only the force of the rules that make it binding. In December 2025, the Council of the European Union agreed its position on the digital euro while proposing to strengthen the legal role of cash, a sign that the two matters are advancing together.
A point of honesty is required, because a popular claim circulates wrongly: there is, to date, no decided "3,000 euro limit" for the digital euro. The holding parameters under consideration (caps intended to preserve banking stability) are the subject of discussions and are in no way a settled figure. Distinguishing the project under debate from the enacted decision is part of a rigorous reading of the file.
If the adoption of a digital currency remains uncertain, why are almost all central banks exploring the subject? The Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) 2024 survey confirms it: of 93 central banks surveyed, 91% are working on a retail CBDC, a wholesale one, or both. The documented answer lies in two converging pressures, and none of them boils down to a desire to surveil citizens.
This reading corrects the narrative of a single will to control. The CBDC is not, or not first of all, a surveillance project: it is also a response to the flight of cash and the rise of private quasi-monies. This nuance does not dissolve the risk — a digital currency remains traceable by construction, where the banknote is not — but it forbids reducing the debate to a conspiracy.
The most concrete debate is not philosophical but social: what becomes of the person who cannot, or will not, pay without cash? Cash remains essential for the elderly, the unbanked, areas of low digital coverage, and during network or power outages. Removing cash without a universal alternative would amount to excluding part of society from the most ordinary acts of economic life. The OECD devoted an entire report, in 2025, to the question of safeguarding access to cash in a digital economy.
It is precisely this concern that slows the outright disappearance of cash. In Sweden, the country furthest along the cashless path, the Riksbank called in 2025 for an obligation to accept cash for essential goods and for strengthening banks' responsibility for cash services. Cash is an unconditional option: a means of payment that asks no one's permission, depends on no account, and works when everything else fails. Defending, in public debate, a right to cash is to defend a concrete resilience as much as a freedom — including for those who otherwise adopt digital payments.
Is cash really going to disappear? Its use is declining (52% of point-of-sale payments in the euro area according to SPACE 2024), but no institution has decreed its abolition. The decline of use and the end of legal-tender status are two distinct things; the second is not on the agenda in the euro area.
Will the digital euro replace banknotes? No, according to the ECB itself: the project is presented as a complement to cash, intended to coexist with it. The whole issue is that this stated intention be guaranteed by law, not merely promised.
Is there a 3,000 euro limit set for the digital euro? No. No cap of this kind has been settled; holding parameters are under discussion for financial-stability reasons, but this precise figure is an inaccurate simplification.
To place the decline of cash and the digital euro within the whole file — the global wave of CBDCs, the programmability of money, central banks' projects and their documented failures — read the pillar article that helps to understand the digital euro. And if you want the full investigation, marked out level of certainty by level of certainty and backed by primary sources (BIS, IMF, ECB), Tome 2 — The Architecture of Control distinguishes, piece by piece, capability from intention.
Its use is declining (52% of point-of-sale payments in the euro area according to SPACE 2024), but no institution has decreed its abolition. The decline of use and the end of legal-tender status are two distinct things; the second is not on the agenda in the euro area.
No, according to the ECB itself: the project is presented as a complement to cash, intended to coexist with it. The whole issue is that this stated intention be guaranteed by law, not merely promised.
No. No cap of this kind has been settled; holding parameters are under discussion for financial-stability reasons, but this precise figure is an inaccurate simplification.
In France, a cash payment between a private individual and a professional has been capped at 1,000 euros since 2015. European regulation 2024/1624 introduces a common cap of 10,000 euros across the EU on 10 July 2027 (identity check above 3,000 euros). A cap is not an abolition of cash.
No. On 18 February 2026, before the National Assembly, its governor declared that the Banque de France "will never abandon" cash and that access to cash is "a central right". The use of cash is declining, but access to it remains guaranteed.
Dossier : Monnaie & identité numérique : l'architecture du contrôle
TOME 2: L'Architecture du Contrôle
Accueil · Collection · Journal · Dossiers · Sources